I'm a graphic artist and I have tried a lot of color picker in my
entire career I have to buy expensive graphic tools such as photo editor, color picker, logo maker and a lot of graphic and
photo editing software. I have to buy it becuase i really need it badly but when my friend tell me about this AdesClrPicker I try it because it is free and you know what i was impress it is very easy
to use and it is powerful color picker software. Capture colors in either HTML, RGB, C++, VB and Delphi color codes. Try it
to believe it.
MAKE MONEY ONLINE
A blog is often a mixture of what is happening in a person's life and what is happening on the
Web, a kind of hybrid diary/guide site, although there are as many unique types of blogs as there are people. People maintained
blogs long before the term was coined, but the trend gained momentum with the introduction of automated published systems,
most notably Blogger at blogger.com. Thousands of people use services such as Blogger to simplify and accelerate the publishing
process. Blogs are alternatively called web logs or weblogs. However, "blog" seems less likely to cause confusion, as "web
log" can also mean a server's log files. Many people waste their time by playing online games, chating, surfing and connecting
with their friends. But for me why not use the internet for business. Some people say it is imposible but a lot of people
specially those people who has knowledge in Web publishing and internet marketing. They earned not less than $3000 a month.Running
your own home based online business is not a part time business but one of many ways to make healthy money. Home based business
might not be suitable for everybody other than for people who are looking for money making machines; home based online business
is the best job they can think of. You may come across many business opportunities, but you must be exclusive in finding the
best one. It may be very much easy to initiate an online home business, but you will need to work very hard if you want to
develop and maintain your business and to achieve success. You have to implement some top strategies to become successful
your business. To start with, you can simply learn those strategies from the top internet marketers.
SOUL FOR SALE
It seems to be the week of wondering aloud about the morality of mankind. A few days ago I was thinking
about how countries treat their own citizens (the Holocaust), and how countries act towards people in need in other countries
(Rwanda, the Sudan). Now I'm thinking about how we as individuals treat others. Specifically, I'm thinking about Kevin
Carter. Kevin Carter was a photojournalist from South Africa who made a
career of being right in the middle of suffering and strife. He took amazing photos documenting the atrocities in various
African countries, as well as Kosovo. He took one amazing photo in particular: This is a photo of a starving child. The
child is trying to make its way to a feeding station in the distance, out of frame, in the hamlet of Ayod, in southern Sudan,
during a time of widespread famine in the area. A vulture is shadowing the child, waiting for it to die so that it may feed. It
is a powerful, unsettling photo. There are specific instances when I believe images convey a story more precisely than words
ever can, and that is one of those instances. Sometimes a concept - starvation, mass wartime casualties, etc. - is so abstract
that merely reporting the facts doesn't really make a connection with a reader. We read the headlines - "Firefight Kills 25
Marines In Fallujah" - and we understand that a lot of people died, but the true realization of what that means is often not
fully felt just by reading the words. As much as I love words, they can at times be antiseptic, especially if you do not have
a preexisting, personal connection to the subject. This is especially true in hard news reporting (as opposed to feature writing). But
show us an image depicting starvation, or an image showing the flag-draped caskets of those 25 marines who were killed in
action, and we often then have a much fuller understanding of the concept. So for that reason, I think Carter's photo is
an important one. The world agreed - the image won Carter the Pulitzer Prize for Feature Photography in 1994. All Carter
had to give up for it was his soul.
(Carter) heard a soft, high-pitched whimpering and saw a
tiny girl trying to make her way to the feeding center. As he crouched to photograph her, a vulture landed in view. Careful
not to disturb the bird, he positioned himself for the best possible image. He would later say he waited about 20 minutes,
hoping the vulture would spread its wings. It did not, and after he took his photographs, he chased the bird away and watched
as the little girl resumed her struggle. Afterward he sat under a tree, lit a cigarette, talked to God and cried. )
He watched this child pull her body along the ground for TWENTY MINUTES in a desperate effort to get
to the feeding station, but he did nothing. He did nothing. He was waiting for the vulture to spread its wings so that he
might get "the perfect shot." How disappointed he must have been that the vulture wouldn't cooperate. I understand full
well that journalists are supposed to be fair, impartial observers to the events they are documenting. I lived that life for
almost 10 years; I know what it means. I know we aren't supposed to become participants, no matter how much we want to. But
Carter got his shot. He had finished being the observer. And yet he still did nothing. Oh, I guess he should be given some
modicum of credit for chasing the vulture away. Good show. But then he ran off instead of helping the child reach the feeding
station. He could have picked her up and taken her there himself. And if that seemed too much like participating - a line
he didn't want to cross - he could have gone to the feeding station and directed them to the child. But he did nothing. Where
was his soul? How could he just leave the child there to die? I could understand his behavior if he was in a position
where he was forced to make a decision between getting the photo - an image that would "make the world weep" and do a great
public service by helping people better understand what starvation looks like - and helping the child. But he didn't have
to choose one or the other; he could have done both. I will never understand why he chose not to. Carter
committed suicide two months after receiving the Pulitzer Prize.
|